=+i. Suppose I had offered the lowest possible k that would induce you to enter the game

Question:

=+i. Suppose I had offered the lowest possible k that would induce you to enter the game instead;

that is, the one you derived in (b). Would the allocation chosen through the gamble be efficient in that case? Could it be supported as an equilibrium outcome with some equilibrium price?

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Question Posted: