=+19.6. Show that a Bayes rule corresponding to p = ( p), .... p.) may not be

Question:

=+19.6. Show that a Bayes rule corresponding to p = ( p), .... p.) may not be admissible if p; = 0 for some i. But there will be a better Bayes rule that is admissible.

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Question Posted: