Modern portfolio theory tends to define risky investments in terms of just two factors: expected returns and
Question:
Modern portfolio theory tends to define risky investments in terms of just two factors:
expected returns and variance (or standard deviation) of those expected returns.
What assumptions need to be made about investors and the expected investment returns (one assumption in each case) to justify this ‘two factor’ approach? Are these assumptions justified in real life?
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Related Book For
Question Posted: