For several years Martin engaged Watson, a CPA, to prepare the financial statements for the construction business which Martin owned and operated in his own name. Franklin is the owner of a building which Martin built on a cost-plus-fixed-fee basis. Franklin sued Martin, alleging that Martin overcharged him by inflating the cost to construct his building. In preparing for trial, Franklin obtained a court order requiring Watson to turn over to Franklin all Watson's work papers and correspondence relating to Martin's construction business. At the subsequent trial, Franklin's attorney sought to introduce in evidence the work papers and correspondence subpoenaed pursuant to the court order. Martin's attorney objected, claiming that the papers were inadmissible evidence. 

1. What is the legal basis for Martin's attorney's objection to the admission of the papers in evidence? Explain. 

2. Will the evidence be admitted? Explain. 

3. Who owns the working papers prepared by Watson? Explain.