Draw five columns for each group and list the selected person and his/her characteristics for each group. For each column, ask the students whether they believe these traits or attributions would lead to good or bad leader effectiveness for the group’s type of leader? Why or why not? What would the opposite or alternative strategies result in those contexts, and why? What similarities do you see between the lists? From the results of this exercise, does it appear that what it takes to be a good leader is different depending on the context? For each context, does it appear that what makes for leader emergence within the context is different from what makes leaders effective?