The project manager is also the director of FS, one of several departments that will be affected by the new benefits system. Does this seem like a good idea? What are the pros and cons of her being selected?

Senior management of Shah Alam Medical Center decided to procure and implement a new system that would reduce the cost and improve the service of its employee benefits coverage.
The new system would have to meet four goals: improved responsiveness to employee needs, added benefits flexibility, better cost management, and greater coordination of human resource objectives with business strategies. A multifunctional team of 13 members was formed with representatives from four departments—Human Resources (HR), Financial Systems (FS), and Information Services (IS)—and six technical experts from the consulting firm of Hun and Bar Software (HBS).
Early in the project, a workshop was held with participants from Shah Alam and HBS to clarify and finalize project objectives and develop a project plan and schedule. Project completion was set at 10 months. In that time, HBS had to develop and supply all hardware and software for the new system; the system had to be brought online, tested, and approved; HR workers had to be trained how to operate the system and load existing employee data; all Shah Alam employees had to be educated about and enrolled in the new benefits process; and the enrollment data had to be entered in the system.
The director of FS was chosen to oversee the project. She had the technical background and had previously worked in the IS group on another project; everyone on the team approved of her appointment as project leader. She selected two team leaders to assist her, one each from HR and IS. The HR leader’s task was to ensure that the new system met HR requirements and the needs of Shah Alam employees. The IS leader’s task was to ensure that the new software interfaced with other Shah Alam systems.