1. job opportunity that you have held or with which you are familiar within the same organization for this scenario. (note: you may create and / or make all necessary assumptions needed for the completion of these tasks. in your original work, you may use aspects of existing processes from either your current or a former place of employment. however, you must remove any and all identifying information that would enable someone to discern the organization

2. outline an application process that details the organization’s method of accepting all applications, as well as its method of validating applicants’ attainment of the required credentials (e.g., reviewing resumes, collecting transcripts, verifying certifications, etc.) for the job opportunity.

3. develop a five- (5) step procedure for the hr department to use in order to maintain all applicants’ records in case a discriminatory charge occurs.

4. decide on three (3) background checks that the hr department must utilize, and justify the relevance of each background check for the job opportunity.

5.choose three (3) employment tests (e.g., drug tests, medical examinations, hiv tests, generic tests, polygraphs, honesty tests, psychological tests, intelligence and skills tests, and physical fitness, etc.) that the hr department should use. justify the relevance of each selected employment test to the job requirements.

6. formulate a policy for making both the hiring and promotional decisions related to the job opportunity. specify the major challenges and potential adverse impact of using subjective criteria for assessing soft skills. next, suggest one (1) plan to mitigate the adverse impact. justify your suggestion..

7. recommend two (2) types of reasonable accommodations for both disabled applicants and applicants needing special religious considerations. argue two (2) legal reasons for not being able to sufficiently provide such reasonable accommodation for each group.

8. select one (1) case in which a court charged an organization with an affirmative action violation and one (1) case in which a court charged the organization with not managing harassment issues more expeditiously. recommend an action plan geared toward preventing the issues addressed in both cases within your selected organization. justify your recommendation.

9. choose three (3) work-life conflicts that the hr director should consider within the selected organization. then, outline a policy geared toward resolving each conflict through the use of related employment laws. justify your response.