1. (10 points) The interstate system basically involves the balance of power in the world. The balance of power theory in international relations suggests that states may secure their survival by preventing any one state from gaining enough militate power to dominate all others. If one state becomes much stronger, the theory predicts it will take advantage of its weaker neighbors, thereby driving them to unite in a defensive coalition. When threatened, states may seek safety either by balancing, allying with others against the prevailing threat; or bandwagoning, aligning themselves with the threatening power. Realists have long debated how the polarity of a system impacts the choice of tactics; however, it is generally agreed that in bipolar systems, each great power has no choice but to directly confront the other. Some realists maintain that a balance-of-power system is more stable than one with a dominant state, as aggression is unprofitable when there is equilibrium of power between rival coalitions. (Wikipedia) How is globalization changing the overall balance of power between states and citizens? 2. (10 points) In what ways do international regimes for politico-economic integration (such as the E.U.) and for universal norms & international law (the U, N,) contribute to the formation of global consciousness and global governance? 3. (10 points) Give an example for each of the following observed changes in the state under globalization (2 points each) a. New sources of state power b. New forms of collaboration among states c. Subordinate role of the state d. New kinds of pressure on the state e. Non-exclusivity of state power over citizens 4. (10 points) Expound on the concept of the global south as a metaphor of interstate inequality and a reaction to globalization. Give your insights on the discussion of "Introduction: The Starbucks and the Shanty mentioned by Lisandro Claudio in the article, Locating the Global South