$19\mathrm{.}1$ Sexual Harassment The Pennsylvania State Police $($PSP$)$ hired Nancy Drew Suders as a police communications operator for the MeConnellsbarg barracks. Suders's supervisors were Sengcant Erie D$.$ Easton, station commander at the MeConnellsbure barracks, Patrol Corporal William D$.$ Baker, and Corporal Eric b$.$ Prendergast. These three supervisors subjected Suders to a continuous barrage of sexual harassment that ceased up the subject of people having sex with animals would bring Suders entered his office. He told Prenderinst, in front of Suders, that young girls should be given instruetion in how to gratify men with oral sex. Easton also would sit how near Suders, wearing Spandex shorts, and spread his down apart. Baker repeatedly made obscene gestures in Suders's presence and shouted out vulgar comments in Suders's Baker made these gestures as many as $5$ to $10$ times sex. night throughout Suders's employment at the barracks. Further, Baker would rub his rear end in front of her and remark "I have a nice ass, don't I?" Five months after being hired, Suders contacted Virginia Smith$-$Elliot, PSP$\text{'}$s equal opportunity officer, and stated that she was being harassed at work and was afraid. Smith$-$Elliot's response appeared to Suders to be insensitive and unhelpful. Two days later, Suders resigned from the force. Suders sued PSP$,$ alle$$ing that she had been subject to sexual harassment and constructively discharged and forced to resign. The employer argued that Suders should not be allowed to brin$$ her case because she had resigned. Can Suders prevail on her sexual harassment claim? Pennsylvania State Police v$.$ Suders, $542$ U$.$S$.129,124$ S$.$Ct$.2342,2004$ U$.$S$.$ Lexis $4176($Supreme Court of the United States, $2004)$