1. A car owner washed her car while it was parked on a public street, in violation of a statute that prohibits the washing of vehicles on public streets during rush hours. The statute was enacted only to expedite the ow of automobile traic. Due to a sudden and unexpected cold snap, the car owner's wastewater formed a puddle that froze. A pedestrian slipped on the ozei puddle and broke her leg. The pedestrian sued the car owner to recover for her injury. Under the doctrine of negligence per so: A. The pedestrian will win because the car owner violated the statute. B. The pedestrian will win because the water posed a reasonany foreseeable risk of harm, and the car owner failed to eliminate that risk. C. The pedestrian will not win because she assumed the risk of walking when it was likely, that puddles would be 'ozen. D. The pedestrian will not win because she did not suffer harm of a kind the statute was intended to protect against