1. According to the Montreal Convention a carrier cannot limit but increase or remove the cap on the compensation set out the convention for any damage, delay, loss, destruction of cargo, baggage and bodily injury or death of passengers for which he, his servant and or agents is liable. Discuss. [10marks] 2. Discuss how both the Montreal and Warsaw Convention limit a carrier's liability in relation to destroyed, loss and or damaged cargo. [10markks] 3. Discuss the functions of the airway bill in the carriage of goods by air. [10marks] 4. The Montreal convention 1999 contains five chapters. You are required to read the relevant chapters and provide a detailed and comprehensive review /analysis of any one of the five chapters of your choice. In doing so you must make mention of case law and articles to support your response. Please discuss the pre-selected chapter [10 marks] 5. A fundamental tenet of all the international air conventions is the presumed liability of the air carrier for all loss or damage during air carriage. Thus, the claimant whose goods are lost or damaged does not need to prove that the carrier was at fault. In this respect, the relevant provisions of the international air conventions are substantially the same, with minor semantic differences for the Montreal Convention 1999. Discuss [10marks]