1) Acid Jazz Caf is a business which operates a successful chain of live venues in other cities, at which contemporary jazz and related music is performed. It recently applied for a licence to enable it to open a venue in Borchester city centre. It is confident there is demand for this form of music, and along with its application provided written evidence concerning audience numbers at its venues in other cities. The application was considered and refused by a Council licensing committee of five councillors, on the basis of the papers provided to it. In the letter of refusal sent to Acid Jazz Caf, the Council relied upon an additional unpublished policy of limiting the number of live music venues in the city centre, as there are many already there. The management of Caf discovered that one of the councillors is the brother of the owner of an existing live music venue in Borchester and that a second member of the committee is a noted music critic who has described acid jazz as "an abomination". It learned that the evidence it submitted concerning audience numbers in other cities was dismissed by the committee as "not relevant here". Advise Acid Jazz Caf, who wish to challenge the refusal to grant them a licence and give me perfect structure including procedural impropriety , Time limit Grounds , Other grounds, bias , Why how what , Apply test , Exceptions, remedies, clauses based on constitutional and administrative law

2) Musicality Caf is an existing live entertainment venue, featuring live music seven days a week inBorchester. Its licence contains the condition that it must "take all reasonable steps to prevent theselling and consumption of illegal drugs on its premises". Musicality Caf has been sent a letter byBorchester Council stating that it is planning to cancel the licence, because it considers that themanagement of Musicality Caf have not taken reasonable steps to prevent the selling andconsumption of illegal drugs on the premises. No information as to the source of the allegations isgiven, but a hearing is scheduled within two weeks of the date of the letter.When the management of Musicality Caf arrive at the hearing they are told that they will not beallowed to be represented by their lawyer, and that for "operational reasons" details of theallegations and the source of the information cannot be given. They are however permitted to askquestions of the local authority enforcement officer. The appeal panel confirms the decision tocancel the licence, without giving reasons.Advise Musicality Caf, who wish to challenge the removal of their licence give the points on judicial review , locus standi, grounds, should legal rep to be given? , how much time should be allowed for preparing for hearing, no reason against cafe, ouster clauses and remedies