1. Although tort law is generally concerned with striking a balance between the desire to provide compensation and the desire to protect socially useful activities from liability. Why is that issue particularly important in the context of the tort of negligence?

2. Does the duty of care analysis differ if the plaintiff complains about psychiatric injuries rather than physical injuries? Explain.

3. Explain the concept of reasonable foreseeability. How is that concept related to the issue of risk management? At which stage(s) of the negligence analysis does the concept arise?

4. "Causation is determined on a balance of probabilities in an all-or-nothing manner." What does that statement mean?