1. Analyzeeach of these threecases in your mind and then state the legal issues to be considered.

2. Evaluate the legal issues in this case and determine the strengths and weaknesses of (a.) the suit by the Plaintiff against the defendant. List the strengths and weaknesses you identify.

3. Deduce logical and specific arguments based on the information you have learned in Chapters 1, 4, and 6 of your textbook and what you have learned in this course. (I am looking for verifiable deductions from the material we have covered and not just your opinion). You also must cite the source which is the basis for your deduction such as the cases or the writings that are similar which we have covered. You may also seek and cite outsource reputable sources.

4. Infer and state your logical legal conclusions based on your analysis, evaluations, and evidence you have previously stated. This legal conclusion should include (a.) who should win the law suit, and legally why and (b.) who should win the law suit.

Case #3- The plaintiff fell down an unlighted stairway in the defendant's public building. The plaintiff's injury occurred at night. A city ordinance required the stairways in buildings open to the public to be constantly lighted. Discuss who should win this case in light of the tort of negligence and all of the allowable legal defenses. What should the court hold and state the legal reasoning for this holding. Explain the definitions of the legal terms relied upon in this case. What is the legal basis for the Plaintiff's case? Substantiate your answer by legal reasoning. What is the legal basis for the defendant (the property owner)? Explain this defense. Substantiate your answer by legal reasoning.Monsour v. Excelsior Tobacco Co., 115 S.W.2d 219 (Mo. App. 1938).