1. Are we together but alone as Turkle suggests? Is social media and the technology that enables its constant use (cell phones, laptops, tablets) just an effort to never be alone? Is Turkle right that we don't know how to be comfortable being alone, and as a result we are always lonely? Do we like these technologies because of the level of control over our self-presentation they offer? 2. Slater's take on this distinction shifts from the question of whether this internet world is or is not the same as the "real/offline" world, by shifting the question to instead ask "why and when do participants choose to talk about 'cyberspaces' as if they are separate from other spheres of social action, and to what extent." So, what do you think? Why do people draw a distinction between the online and offline world? What's the benefit of claiming this separation exists or doesn't? If for instance, we draw a hard line between our online and offline worlds, how might that benefit us? How might it harm us? 3. People often make a big deal about whether someone is "real" or "fake", and we did this long before the internet was invented. Putting aside the possibility that someone might be outright lying about their identity online, how do we deal with the fact that the online version of you, is not quite the same as the version of you that walks around out in the "real world". How are we to understand the online you vs. the offline you. Which one is real and which one fake? Both real? Both fake? Or is talking about people in these terms, real and fake, less relevant in the internet age