Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

1. Brockville Brackets (BB) has a three-year-old robot that welds small brackets onto carframe assemblies. At the time the robot was purchased, it cost $300

1. Brockville Brackets (BB) has a three-year-old robot that welds small brackets onto carframe assemblies. At the time the robot was purchased, it cost $300 000 and an additional $50 000 was spent on installation. BB acquired the robot as part of an eight-year contract to produce the car-frame assemblies. The useful life of the robot is 12 years, and its value is estimated to decline by 20 percent of the current value per year, as shown in the first table below. Operating and maintenance costs estimated when the robot was purchased are also shown in the table. BB has found that the operating and maintenance costs for the robot have been higher than anticipated. At the end of the third year, new estimates of the operating and maintenance costs are shown in the second table on the next page. BB has determined that the reason the operating and maintenance costs were in error was that the robot was positioned too close to existing equipment for the mechanics to repair it easily and quickly. BB is considering moving the robot farther away from some adjacent equipment so that mechanics can get easier access for repairs. To move the robot will cause BB to lose valuable production time, which is estimated to have a cost of $25 000. However, once complete, the move will lower maintenance costs to what had originally been expected for the remainder of the contract (e.g., $40 000 for the fourth year, increasing by 10 percent per year thereafter). Moving the robot will not affect its salvage value.1. Brockville Brackets (BB) has a three-year-old robot that welds small brackets onto carframe assemblies. At the time the robot was purchased, it cost $300 000 and an additional $50 000 was spent on installation. BB acquired the robot as part of an eight-year contract to produce the car-frame assemblies. The useful life of the robot is 12 years, and its value is estimated to decline by 20 percent of the current value per year, as shown in the first table below. Operating and maintenance costs estimated when the robot was purchased are also shown in the table. BB has found that the operating and maintenance costs for the robot have been higher than anticipated. At the end of the third year, new estimates of the operating and maintenance costs are shown in the second table on the next page. BB has determined that the reason the operating and maintenance costs were in error was that the robot was positioned too close to existing equipment for the mechanics to repair it easily and quickly. BB is considering moving the robot farther away from some adjacent equipment so that mechanics can get easier access for repairs. To move the robot will cause BB to lose valuable production time, which is estimated to have a cost of $25 000. However, once complete, the move will lower maintenance costs to what had originally been expected for the remainder of the contract (e.g., $40 000 for the fourth year, increasing by 10 percent per year thereafter). Moving the robot will not affect its salvage value.1. Brockville Brackets (BB) has a three-year-old robot that welds small brackets onto carframe assemblies. At the time the robot was purchased, it cost $300 000 and an additional $50 000 was spent on installation. BB acquired the robot as part of an eight-year contract to produce the car-frame assemblies. The useful life of the robot is 12 years, and its value is estimated to decline by 20 percent of the current value per year, as shown in the first table below. Operating and maintenance costs estimated when the robot was purchased are also shown in the table. BB has found that the operating and maintenance costs for the robot have been higher than anticipated. At the end of the third year, new estimates of the operating and maintenance costs are shown in the second table on the next page. BB has determined that the reason the operating and maintenance costs were in error was that the robot was positioned too close to existing equipment for the mechanics to repair it easily and quickly. BB is considering moving the robot farther away from some adjacent equipment so that mechanics can get easier access for repairs. To move the robot will cause BB to lose valuable production time, which is estimated to have a cost of $25 000. However, once complete, the move will lower maintenance costs to what had originally been expected for the remainder of the contract (e.g., $40 000 for the fourth year, increasing by 10 percent per year thereafter). Moving the robot will not affect its salvage value.

image text in transcribed
If BB Uses a MARR of 15 Percent, Should it more the robot ? If So, when ? Remember that the contract exists only for a further five years. Defender , when new Life ( Years ) Salvage Valye operating and $ 3 0 0 0 0 0 Maintenance Costs. 240 00 0 192 00 0 $ 4000 0 40 00 0 15300 0 40 000 122000 40 000 98 304 44 00 0 78 643 48 400 62 915 53 240 50 332 58 564 40 265 64 420 32 212 70 862 25 770 77 949 20626 85 744 Costs for TheRe - Year-old Defender Additional Life / Salvage Value operating and ( Years ) Maintenance costs $ 153 000 122 880 $ 50 002 98 304 55 000 78 643 60 500 62 915 66 550 50 3 32 73 205

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Technical Change, Relative Prices, And Environmental Resource Evaluation

Authors: V Kerry Smith

1st Edition

1317358570, 9781317358572

More Books

Students also viewed these Economics questions

Question

2. It is the results achieved that are important.

Answered: 1 week ago