(1). Case Question 4 on Page 21 of the text reads in pertinent part as follows: Johnson Controls adopted a "fetal protection policy" that women of childbearing age could not work in the battery-making division of the company. Exposure to lead in the battery operation could cause harm to unborn babies. The company was concerned about possible legal liability for injury suffered by babies of mothers who had worked in the battery division. The Supreme Court held the company policy was illegal. It was an "excuse for denying women equal employment opportunities." United Auto Workers v. Johnson Controls, 499 U.S. 187 (1981). (a) Summarize the holding and rationale of the Supreme Court's decision in the case. (b) Evaluate the ethics of the Johnson Controls "fetal protection policy" i.e., in your view, was it ethical, unethical or both, and why? (b) Explain, in your view, if and/or how Johnson Controls could have changed its internal policy on this issue to be more ethical