1. Chopra v. Eaton (T. ) Co. (1999), 240 A.R. 201 (Q.B.); 1999 ABQB 201 (CanLII) Chopra went to Eaton's department store seeking a refund. An argument ensued. Frauenfeld (from security) told Chopra that he would have to leave, Frauenfeld took Chopra's elbow and started to escort him out of the store. Near the doors, Chopra pushed Frauenfeld away, presumably wishing to go through the doors unassisted. Frauenfeld reacted quickly and violently, putting Chopra into a headlock. Chopra's glasses were knocked off and his lip was cut; he was handcuffed, detained in the security office, and subjected to racial slurs. Chopra asked to leave, asked to call his wife, and asked Frauenfeld to call the police; all of these requests were refused. After Chopra had been detained for four hours or more, the police arrived and charged Chopra with assaulting Franenfeld and causing a disturbance. All charges were later dismissed. Identify what causes of action are available to Chopra to address the wrongs done to him. 3. Duke v. Puts (2004), 21 C.C.L.T. (3d) 181, [2004] 6 W.W.R. 208 (Sask. C.A.); 2004 SKCA 12 (CanLII) Duke, a pharmacist, operated a successful pharmacy in Saskatchewan for 20 years. Dr. Puts developed a suspicion about Duke's association with a physician in another town; Puts accused Duke of conspiring with that physician to cheat the health-care system by claiming for false prescriptions and double billing. In a letter of complaint sent to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan Puts alleged professional misconduct against Duke. He told other people that Duke was a crook. These accusations greatly harmed the pharmacist's reputation and business and caused him to sell his business at a reduced price. Assuming all the allegations were false, what tort actions could Duke bring against Dr. Puts? What defences, if any, could the defendant assert