1) Click on the following link and view the Intellectual Property (IP) video:watch this first

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Yp_Xj6YshM&ab_channel=toolroom

read the chapter if you need here chapter link https://bbhosted.cuny.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-60820259-dt-content-rid-463975324_1/xid-463975324_1

2) Based on your reading of chapter 6 and viewing of the youtube video above, you should answer the Chapter 6 Hypothetical questions found below. Please explain and provide support your responses.

Chapter6 - Trademark Infringement.Alpha Software, Inc., announced a new computer operating system to be marketed under the name McSoftware. McDonald's Corp. wrote Alpha a letter stating that the use of this name infringed on the McDonald's family of trademarks characterized by the prefix "Mc" attached to a generic term. Alpha claimed that "Mc" had come into generic use as a prefix and therefore McDonald's had no trademark rights to the prefix itself. Alpha filed an action seeking a judgment from the court that the mark McSoftware did not infringe on McDonald's federally registered trademarks or its common law rights to the marks and that its use would not constitute an unfair trade practice. What factors must the court consider in deciding this issue? What will be the probable outcome of the case? Explain. (SeeTrademarks and Related Property.)

Chapter 6 - Copyright Infringement.Universal Music Group (UMG) regularly ships free, unsolicited promotional CDs to music critics and others. The labels state that they are "the property of the record company" and for "Promotional Use OnlyNot for Sale." When Troy Augusto sold some of the CDs through online auction sites, UMG filed a complaint in a federal district court, alleging copyright infringement. UMG argued that it had only licensed the CDs to the recipients and that ownership had not transferred to Augusto. Could Augusto sell, or otherwise dispose of, the CDs? Explain.(SeeCopyrights.)

Chapter 6 - Patents.The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) denied Raymond Gianelli's application for a patent for a "Rowing Machine"an exercise machine that requires a user topullon handles to perform a rowing motion against a selected resistance in order to strengthen the back muscles. The PTO considered the device obvious in light of a previously patented "Chest Press Apparatus for Exercising Regions of the Upper Body"a chest press exercise machine on which a userpusheson handles to overcome a selected resistance. On what ground might this result be reversed on appeal? Discuss. (SeePatents.)