1. Did the Bogles learn criminal tendencies from their family members? 2. What other factors (e.g., peers) may have influenced them? I believe that the Bogles did learn criminal tendencies from their family members because in the case study it said that one of Roosters sons Tracey told butterfield that Rooster hated toys and sports, and the only fun things to him was stealing and that he took them with him to burglarize their neighbors' homes, or steal their cows and chickens, or take their social security checks out of their mailboxes (Schram & Tibbetts, 2020). This statement goes on to show that their criminal tendencies were learned. Rooster took his children with him because he wanted them to see what he did and for them to learn and be like him. In the case study it also said that Rooster gave his son Bobby a heavy metal wrench for Christmas and that later on Bobby and his brothers used that gift to break into a grocery store and steal soda (Schram & Tibbetts, 2020). When Rooster learned of their crime he smiled and said "Yeah, that's my sons" (Schram & Tibbetts, 2020). Any other parent would have scolded their children and tell them what they did was wrong, but not Rooster. He was genuinely happy that they committed that crime and that they were following in his footsteps. He even showed them the jail they were going to when they got older which I think is pretty crazy. You can tell that he really didn't want the best for his children and that's pretty sad. Some other factors that might have influenced them could be the individuals that they hung out with. If they surrounded themselves with people who do the same as them, that could have influenced them greatly. If they were to do something around those individuals, they wouldn't be told that their actions were wrong they would be encouraged to do it even more. They wouldn't