[1] Do some research into the case of Maureen Kass vs. Steven Kass and answer the following (if you use a quote on the case, you must reference it and limit it to no more than 40 words and no more than one quote):What was and what was not natural or in keeping with our natural inclinations in this case of Maureen and Steven Kass and what difference does that make in terms of the moral questions at issue here?Who should have won this case and why based on natural law or natural inclinations?Are frozen fertilized eggs the property of anyone and if so whose and if not why not?How would the implantation of a fertilized egg in the womb change its status as property or person or what?