1 Do the pros outweigh the cons of college athletes being paid There are many pros and cons to consider when debating whether college athletes should be paid Some of the pros include Fairness College athletes generate billions of dollars in revenue for their schools and the NCAA, but they are not allowed to share in that revenue Paying college athletes would be a fairer way to distribute this wealth Financial security Many college athletes come from low income backgrounds and struggle to meet their basic needs Paying college athletes would help them to cover their living expenses and other financial obligations Increased motivation and performance Paying college athletes would give them more incentive to train hard and perform well This could lead to a higher level of competition and a better overall college sports experience for everyone involved Some of the cons include Cost Paying college athletes would be expensive for schools and the NCAA This could lead to higher tuition costs for students and other cuts to athletic programs Competitive balance Paying college athletes could give some schools an unfair advantage over others This could lead to a less competitive and less exciting college sports landscape Amateurism Some people argue that paying college athletes would undermine the amateur spirit of college sports Ultimately, whether or not the pros outweigh the cons of paying college athletes is a matter of opinion There are strong arguments to be made on both sides of the issue 2 Do the pros outweigh the cons of college being free or zero tuition There are also many pros and cons to consider when debating whether college should be free or have zero tuition Some of the pros include Access Making college free would make it more accessible to students from all socioeconomic backgrounds This could help to create a more equitable society Economic benefits A college educated workforce is more productive and innovative, which can lead to economic growth Social mobility College can help people to move up the socioeconomic ladder and achieve the American Dream Some of the cons include Cost Making college free would be very expensive for the government This could lead to higher taxes or cuts to other important programs Quality If college were free, there might be a decrease in the quality of education as schools try to cut costs Overcrowding If college were free, there might be a dramatic increase in enrollment This could lead to overcrowded classrooms and other problems Ultimately, whether or not the pros outweigh the cons of making college free is a matter of opinion There are strong arguments to be made on both sides of the issue 3 Should the federal government forgive federal student loan debt There are also many pros and cons to consider when debating whether the federal government should forgive federal student loan debt Some of the pros include Economic relief Forgiving student loan debt would provide much needed economic relief to millions of Americans This could boost the economy by increasing consumer spending and investment Fairness Many borrowers took out student loans at high interest rates and are now struggling to repay them Forgiving student loan debt would help these borrowers to get out of debt and improve their financial situation Social mobility Forgiving student loan debt would make it easier for people to start businesses, buy homes, and save for retirement This could help to create a more equitable society Some of the cons include Cost Forgiving student loan debt would be very expensive for the government This could lead to higher taxes or cuts to other important programs Moral hazard Some people argue that forgiving student loan debt would encourage people to take out more loans than they can afford to repay This could lead to a financial crisis in the future Unfairness Some people argue that forgiving student loan debt would be unfair to people who have already paid off their loans or who chose not to go to college Ultimately, whether or not the federal government should forgive federal student loan debt is a matter of opinion There are strong arguments to be made on both sides of the issue 4 Do the pros of a federally decided common school curricula (like Common Core) outweigh the cons There are also many pros and cons to consider when debating whether the federal government should mandate a common school curricula for all states Some of the pros include Consistency A common school curricula would ensure that all students are learning the same basic skills and knowledge This could help to prepare students for college and careers more effectively Equity A common school curricula would help to ensure that all students, regardless of where they live, have access to a high quality education Accountability A common school curricula would make it easier to hold schools accountable for student achievement Some of the cons include Loss of local control A common school curricula would reduce the ability of local school districts to tailor their curriculum to the needs of their students and communities Lack of flexibility A common school curricula would make it difficult for schools to adapt to changes in technology and the workplace Resistance to change Many teachers and parents are opposed to Common Core and other federally mandated curricula This resistance can make it difficult to implement and enforce these curricula effectively Ultimately, whether or not the pros outweigh the cons of a federally decided common school curricula is a matter of opinion There are strong arguments to be made on both sides of the issue 5 Do the pros outweigh the cons of tenure for instructors There are also many pros and cons to consider when debating whether tenure is a good thing for instructors Some of the pros include Academic freedom Tenure protects instructors' academic freedom and allows them to conduct their research and teach their classes without fear of censorship or retribution Job security Tenure gives instructors job security, which allows them to focus on their teaching and research without worrying about losing their jobs Diversity of thought Tenure helps to ensure that a variety of viewpoints are represented in academia Some of the cons include Cost Tenure is expensive for universities It can be difficult and expensive to fire tenured instructors, even if they are not performing well Deadwood Some people argue that tenure protects underperforming instructors and prevents universities from firing them This can lead to a decrease in the quality of teaching and research Lack of accountability Some people argue that tenure makes instructors less accountable to students and taxpayers Which five sources can I use to cite for my research paper I must use at least 3 different types of sources At least two sources must be from a PCC library database At least one source must be from a credible website outside the PCC database a website that is appropriate for academic use At least one source must be scholarly (These may be articles from PCC library databases or books that are peer reviewed )

The Answer is in the image, click to view ...

Answered step by step

Verified Expert Solution

Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Posted on Jun 13, 2024

1. Do the pros outweigh the cons of college athletes being paid? There are many pros and cons to consider when debating whether college athletes

1. Do the pros outweigh the cons of college athletes being paid?

There are many pros and cons to consider when debating whether college athletes should be paid.

Some of the pros include:

Fairness: College athletes generate billions of dollars in revenue for their schools and the NCAA, but they are not allowed to share in that revenue. Paying college athletes would be a fairer way to distribute this wealth.
Financial security: Many college athletes come from low-income backgrounds and struggle to meet their basic needs. Paying college athletes would help them to cover their living expenses and other financial obligations.
Increased motivation and performance: Paying college athletes would give them more incentive to train hard and perform well. This could lead to a higher level of competition and a better overall college sports experience for everyone involved.

Some of the cons include:

Cost: Paying college athletes would be expensive for schools and the NCAA. This could lead to higher tuition costs for students and other cuts to athletic programs.
Competitive balance: Paying college athletes could give some schools an unfair advantage over others. This could lead to a less competitive and less exciting college sports landscape.
Amateurism: Some people argue that paying college athletes would undermine the amateur spirit of college sports.

Ultimately, whether or not the pros outweigh the cons of paying college athletes is a matter of opinion. There are strong arguments to be made on both sides of the issue.

2. Do the pros outweigh the cons of college being free or zero tuition?

There are also many pros and cons to consider when debating whether college should be free or have zero tuition.

Some of the pros include:

Access: Making college free would make it more accessible to students from all socioeconomic backgrounds. This could help to create a more equitable society.
Economic benefits: A college-educated workforce is more productive and innovative, which can lead to economic growth.
Social mobility: College can help people to move up the socioeconomic ladder and achieve the American Dream.

Some of the cons include:

Cost: Making college free would be very expensive for the government. This could lead to higher taxes or cuts to other important programs.
Quality: If college were free, there might be a decrease in the quality of education as schools try to cut costs.
Overcrowding: If college were free, there might be a dramatic increase in enrollment. This could lead to overcrowded classrooms and other problems.

Ultimately, whether or not the pros outweigh the cons of making college free is a matter of opinion. There are strong arguments to be made on both sides of the issue.

3. Should the federal government forgive federal student loan debt?

There are also many pros and cons to consider when debating whether the federal government should forgive federal student loan debt.

Some of the pros include:

Economic relief: Forgiving student loan debt would provide much-needed economic relief to millions of Americans. This could boost the economy by increasing consumer spending and investment.
Fairness: Many borrowers took out student loans at high interest rates and are now struggling to repay them. Forgiving student loan debt would help these borrowers to get out of debt and improve their financial situation.
Social mobility: Forgiving student loan debt would make it easier for people to start businesses, buy homes, and save for retirement. This could help to create a more equitable society.

Some of the cons include:

Cost: Forgiving student loan debt would be very expensive for the government. This could lead to higher taxes or cuts to other important programs.
Moral hazard: Some people argue that forgiving student loan debt would encourage people to take out more loans than they can afford to repay. This could lead to a financial crisis in the future.
Unfairness: Some people argue that forgiving student loan debt would be unfair to people who have already paid off their loans or who chose not to go to college.

Ultimately, whether or not the federal government should forgive federal student loan debt is a matter of opinion. There are strong arguments to be made on both sides of the issue.

4. Do the pros of a federally-decided common school curricula (like Common Core) outweigh the cons?

There are also many pros and cons to consider when debating whether the federal government should mandate a common school curricula for all states.

Some of the pros include:

Consistency: A common school curricula would ensure that all students are learning the same basic skills and knowledge. This could help to prepare students for college and careers more effectively.
Equity: A common school curricula would help to ensure that all students, regardless of where they live, have access to a high-quality education.
Accountability: A common school curricula would make it easier to hold schools accountable for student achievement.

Some of the cons include:

Loss of local control: A common school curricula would reduce the ability of local school districts to tailor their curriculum to the needs of their students and communities.
Lack of flexibility: A common school curricula would make it difficult for schools to adapt to changes in technology and the workplace.
Resistance to change: Many teachers and parents are opposed to Common Core and other federally-mandated curricula. This resistance can make it difficult to implement and enforce these curricula effectively.

Ultimately, whether or not the pros outweigh the cons of a federally-decided common school curricula is a matter of opinion. There are strong arguments to be made on both sides of the issue.

5. Do the pros outweigh the cons of tenure for instructors?

There are also many pros and cons to consider when debating whether tenure is a good thing for instructors.

Some of the pros include:

Academic freedom: Tenure protects instructors' academic freedom and allows them to conduct their research and teach their classes without fear of censorship or retribution.
Job security: Tenure gives instructors job security, which allows them to focus on their teaching and research without worrying about losing their jobs.
Diversity of thought: Tenure helps to ensure that a variety of viewpoints are represented in academia.

Some of the cons include:

Cost: Tenure is expensive for universities. It can be difficult and expensive to fire tenured instructors, even if they are not performing well.
Deadwood: Some people argue that tenure protects underperforming instructors and prevents universities from firing them. This can lead to a decrease in the quality of teaching and research.
Lack of accountability: Some people argue that tenure makes instructors less accountable to students and taxpayers.

Which five sources can I use to cite for my research paper? I must use at least 3 different types of sources.

At least two sources must be from a PCC library database.
At least one source must be from a credible website outside the PCC database-- a website that is appropriate for academic use.
At least one source must be scholarly. (These may be articles from PCC library databases or books that are "peer reviewed.")