1. Do you agree with Dickie that being an artifact is a necessary condition of something's being a work of art? Why or why not? of the artworld and Dickie's? Which theory do you find superior? Why? 3. Do you see any problems with Dickie's assimilation of the artworld to highly formalized social institutions? Explain. 4. Does Dickie give artists too much power? Can any object produced by an artist count as art? Explain. 5. Do you think that the institutional theory of art solves the problems that Weitz raises? Why or why not? 6. Is being a work of art a relational property of physical objects? Explain