1. Do you agree with the decision in the Costa v. Boston Red Sox case? Why or why not? 2. Is it a good business decision for the Red Sox not to voluntarily pay for the injuries sustained by innocent spectators? Should they get an insurance policy for such injuries and absorb the costs as part of their business plan? Why or why not? 3. Should the court have dismissed the injury warning on the ticket in the case? Do you think Costa really had no idea that a ball could possibly come her way? Will signs in the stadium make any difference? How should businesses be required to warn their customers of these kinds of dangers