1.) Does Michael Lomu have any legal rights under contract law or not?2.) "Strict application of privity can mean the intention of parties undermined."Discuss this statement with reference to relevant case authorities.

Question 1 Marine Corp is a company that deals with outboard, inboard, and sterndrive engines. Michael Lomu is a sherman looking for an outboard engine manufactured by Marine Corp. A-Z Marine Supplies is a retailer of Marine Corp's products in Fiji. Michael walks into a branch of A-Z Marine Supplies' store in Suva and asks Rambo (the shop assistant) if he could see a 24 HP outboard engine manufactured by Marine Corp. Rambo tells Michael that outboard engines manufactured by Marine Corp are of superb quality. Since Michael urgently needs the engine, he purchases it and pays $10,500 for a 24 HP outboard engine. He takes the engine home and installs it. The next day he goes out shing After half an hour, the engine suddenly stopped. Michael is very disappointed and asks for a refund of his $10,500. However, the owner of A-Z Marine Supplies says that he is just the retailer of the outboard engine and is not responsible for the engine. He advises Michael Lomu that he should sue the Marine Corp who manufactured the 24 HP outboard engine, and whom A-Z Marine Supplies contracted with to buy the engines from. Does Michael Lomu have any legal rights under contract law or not? Question 2 \"Strict application of privity can mean the intention of parties undermined. \" Discuss this statement with reference to relevant case authorities