1. Find a similar case using the Internet or a law library, find a case that is similar to this fact pattern.

Fact pattern: "During a bar fight, Defendant smashes the Victim in the face. Between the testimony of the bartender, evidence indicating that the Victim had to be hit in the face by someone else, and the bits of glass found on the Victim's clothing, Defendant is convicted of assault and battery. The victim now civilly sues for damages".

2. Compare the case you found with that of the fact pattern.

3. Cite the case you found, and briefly list the facts of the case.

4. Explain how the following may apply to your case, and why the case is similar to the fact pattern:

• Fact versus opinion
• Standard of proof
• Unavoidable acts
• Breach of care
• Degree of negligence
• The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur
• Joint tortfeasors' liability

5. In addition, include whether or not the victim of your case won at his or her civil trial. Do you agree with the verdict? Provide a rationale that supports your opinion.

Please do not directly copy or paste from a previous question asked on here or from the Internet.

Thank you!