1 - Having read the book, if you could change any three aspects of contemporary constitutional law, including judicial decisions and judicial review, what would they be and why?

2 - Do you think posing a tension between constitutional contractarianism and public administrative instrumentalism correctly explains how administrative law fits into contemporary US constitutional government? Why or why not?

3 - Does the rise of "e-government" portend greater democratic participation in administrative decision-making? Why or why not?

4 - Devise a hypothetical situation in which disgruntled voters utilize the process of initiative and referendum to reverse policies established through agency rule-making.

5 - Devise a hypothetical situation in which disgruntled voters utilizeadministrative law toreverse a policy proposed by the following past and current elected officials. (Examples could include, but are not limited to, Trump's Border Wall, Sanders Breakup of the Large Banks, Clinton's Debt-Free Public College or Cruz's Abolishment of the IRS.)

Question 1 - attached is an interesting article

Waldron-CoreCaseJudicial-2006.pdf

https://openyls.law.yale.edu/bitstream/handle/20.500.13051/9638/54_115YaleLJ1346_April2006_.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y

Rosenbloom, D. H. (2023). Administrative law for public managers. Routledge.