1.

In which case did the Court decide that the conduct by the defendant might cause confusion, but was not necessarily misleading or deceptive within the meaning of s52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), now s18 of the Australian Consumer Law:

Group of answer choices

Taco Company of Australia Inc v Taco Bell Pty Ltd 1982.

McDonald's System of Australia Pty Ltd v McWilliams Wines Pty Ltd 1980.

Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd 1982.

Henjo Investments Pty Ltd v Collins Marrickville Pty Ltd 1988.

TPC v The Vales Wine Company Pty Ltd & Ors 1996.

2.

In which of the following business structures do the members enjoy limited liability:

Group of answer choices

A sole trader.

A company.

A partnership.

A trust.

None of the above.

3.

On which date, if any, has an agreement been made in the following circumstances:

1 October - Supplier posts a letter of offer. 8 October - Supplier posts a letter of revocation. 11 October - Customer receives the letter of offer. 11 October - Customer faxes an acceptance letter to the supplier that is received by the supplier. 15 October - Customer posts the original of the acceptance letter. 20 October - Customer receives the letter of revocation.

Group of answer choices

1 October.

8 October.

11 October.

15 October.

20 October.

None of the above dates.