1. Introduction

• Broadly introduce what it means to be exonerated, wrongfully accused, how forensic science plays a role in exonerations, and the groups that help advocate for exonerations.

2. Case Overview: Evidence in Case

• Describe the type(s) of physical evidence that was used for the conviction in Anthony Massingill's case and the forensic analysis that was conducted (if there was no physical evidence analyzed for the conviction in the case.
  • Select at least one type of physical evidence that may have been used based on the type of crime that was allegedly committed in your case to fulfill this portion of the prompt)
  • Describe any non-physical evidence that was used for the conviction in your case (g., eyewitness testimony).
• Describe the type(s) of physical evidence that was used for the exoneration in Anthony Massingill's case and the forensic analysis that was conducted (if there was no physical evidence analyzed for the exoneration in your case.
  • Select at least one type of physical evidence that may have been used based on the type of crime that was allegedly committed in Anthony Massingill's case to fulfill this portion of the prompt)
• • Describe any non-physical evidence that was used for the exoneration in Anthony Massingill's case (g., eyewitness testimony).

3. Critique of Evidence in Case

• Analysis of evidence for conviction
  • Select one of the pieces of physical evidence that was used to exonerate Anthony Massingill's case and explain how the evidence was analyzed and the results of the testing.
  • Identify the weaknesses of this testing and/or type of evidence and incorporate the historical aspects of these weaknesses.
• Analysis of evidence for exoneration
  • Select one of the pieces of physical evidence that was used to exonerate Anthony Massingill's case and explain how the evidence was analyzed and the results of the testing.
  • Identify the strengths of this testing and/or type of evidence and incorporate how the analysis of this evidence type has evolved with new technology.
• Strength of evidence
  • Decide and explain, if you think the exonerating evidence was stronger than the conviction evidence and why, what role did the forensic evidence play overall in the case in declaring innocence?

4. Conclusion

• Summarize this paper into a conclusion paragraph.

5. Update

• Provide an update on Anthony Massingill the exoneree.