1. Koko Marius was under contract for one year to work exclusively as an agent for the Ji Ming Company. However, even before the start of his new job at the Ji Ming Company, he was offered a more attractive pay plus fringes benefits by Xiao Long Inc. Koko Marius accepted the offer and transferred to Xiao Long Inc. Consequently, the Ji Ming Company sues Koko Marius and Xiao Ling Incorporated for breach of contract. Defendants claim that the restriction to pay for the Ji Ming Company along is void, hence, unenforceable, as it constitutes an undue interference with the right of Koko Marius to enter into contracts and the impairment of his freedom to be paid and be able to have his professional growth. a. Was the claim of Koko Marius and Xiao Long Company, correct? Why? b. Suppose there was a memorandum issued that can impair the contract of Koko Marius and the Ji Ming Company, can Koko Marius challenge the contract