1. Mill recognizes that if one had to consider the happiness of all people with every decision, utilitarianism would be too taxing of a moral system. He thinks that in reality most of our decisions only involve a few people and that we ought to take into consideration the happiness of involved peoples in order to decide what would maximize happiness. Further, we can derive certain principles to follow that would generally result in the maximum amount of happiness. Many philosophers consider the critique that a strict utilitarian would get no-rest and suggest rule utilitarianism is the best option. Which version of utilitarianism do you think is best (act or rule)? Why? In your explanation use a scenario (real or imaginary) to support your perspective.

B) What do you think about Singer's argument for effective altruism?

2. Consider the moral dilemmas presented in this BuzzFeed article:https://www.buzzfeed.com/tracyclayton/moral-dilemmas-that-will-break-your-brain

Choose one moral dilemma and state what you think Kant's categorical imperative would require the response to be. Explain your reasoning, applying one version of the categorical imperative in the process using support from the text with citations.

After explaining what Kant's solution would be, briefly explain what you think should be done and why.

Note: Everyone has access to moral dilemmas so you should not explain the dilemma as a part of your post.