$1.$ Motivating employees: MBSC case study

Watch this video in which owner Michael Boyle, cofounder Bob Hanson, and personal trainer Marco Sanchez discuss what motivates people to work at Mike Boyle$$s Strength and Conditioning $($MBSC$).$ Then answer the questions below.

Transcript

Bob Hanson emphasizes that sending MBSC employees to seminars on a regular basis is highly motivating. It$$s possible that for some employees, having to attend seminars is a burden. However, for an employee like Marco, who was excited when he found out he could major in strength and conditioning in college, having the opportunity to further their professional development is a major source of satisfaction and it motivates him to work hard for MBSC$.$ Professional development is described in different ways by different theories of motivation.

If Bob and Mike were analyzing how they motivate their employees in terms of ERG theory, which of the following would be true?

Employees with a high need for achievement would find the opportunity to learn advanced skills at seminars very motivating, while those with a high need for affiliation or power would be less motivated by seminars.

Learning at seminars could meet an employee$$s need for growth, and if the employee were not allowed to attend seminars, then he or she might desire greater participation at work or more pay.

The recognition and autonomy offered by attending seminars would result in satisfaction, but employees might also be dissatisfied if pay were poor or their ideas were not valued.

Attending seminars could meet an employee$$s need for self$-$actualization, but this would be motivating only if pay, job security, inclusion, and recognition needs were also met.