1. Mr Aun advertised his car for sale for RM 20,000 In a local newspaper. Bibi saw the advertisement and telephoned Mr Aun offering him RM15,000 for the car. Mr Aun eventually offered to sell the car for RM18,000. To this, Bibi said that she would need to drive the car before she could agree to such a price. They agreed to meet at Mr Aun's house at a particular time during the weekend, for testdrive. On Thursday, Mr Aun sold the car to Yogy for RM 19,000. Discuss. Mr Aun - ITT 20K , - fisher bell phaumatical Bibi offer 15K, 2(a) (C) 4(a) communication of offer Mr Aun - counter offer 18K (offer) -harvey facey - Revocation of offer Bibi - oferee Issue: The issue is whether the offer is accepted. Law: Section case In the question mentioned above, the advertisement made by Mr Aun in local newspaper is an invitation to treat to the customers, which is Bibi in this situation. Bibi saw the advertisement and telephoned Mr Aun offering him RM15000 for the car, it is Bibi's offer to Mr Aun to buy the car, which Bibi was the offeror in this situation. Mr Aun was the offeree in this situation, which has the right on whether to accept the offer by selling the car to Mr Aun or reject the offer by refusing to sell the car. However, Mr Aun did not accept the offer offered by Bibi and eventually offered to sell the car for RM18,000. Mr Aun made a counter offer As a conclusion, Lisa cannot sue the supermarket in this case. 2. Lisa went to a supermarket and saw on display a jar of honey priced at RM3.50. She took It to the counter but the sales person refused to sell It