1. On what grounds does the Court rule against the presidential power to take over an industry (even during war time) in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company?

2. What facts did the Court find significant in reaching its decision in Mistrettav. United States?

The Court tends to be expansive in cases where Congress is delegating power,as long as they follow the principles outlined in Waymanv Southard(1825), Hampton & Co. v U.S. (1928) and their progeny.

3. The Court is less expansive when Congress seeks to take or reallocate power.

In what specific situation is the Court the least likely to allow Congress to take or allocate power?