Question
(1) Papsie appointed Asie, as agent, who in turn, appointed Sarsie as subagent to perform that which Asie was supposed to do for Papsie. (a)
(1) Papsie appointed Asie, as agent, who in turn, appointed Sarsie as subagent to perform that which Asie was supposed to do for Papsie.
(a) Is the substitution valid?
(b) Is Asie liable to Papsie for damages caused by Sarsie's negligence?
(c) Assuming that the substitution was authorized, may Asie be still liable for Sarsie's negligence?
(2) Popoy, principal, authorized Ayoy, agent, to sell the former's car for not less than P500,000.00. Ayoy sold the car for P550,000.00. Is Ayoy entitled to the P50,000.00 overprice?
(3) Popoy, principal, authorized Ayoy, agent, to sell the former's car for not less than P500,000.00. Can Ayoy buy the car for P500,000?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started