1 point Question at position 11 The U.S. Supreme Court has recognized, interpreted, and protected both (1) the right to a speedy and public trial and (2) the right to privacy against incursions by state governments. Which of the following best states the difference between these two rights? The U.S. Supreme Court has recognized, interpreted, and protected both (1) the right to a speedy and public trial and (2) the right to privacy against incursions by state governments. Which of the following best states the difference between these two rights? The right to privacy, which is explicitly stated in the Bill of Rights, has been "incorporated," so it is applicable to the states. Whereas, the right to a speedy and public trial is not explicitly stated in the Bill of Rights and has not been incorporated against the states. The right to a speedy and public trial is articulated in the Seventh Amendment, while the right to privacy is articulated in the Fifth Amendment. Both of these rights are not explicitly stated in any of the amendments to U.S. Constitution, so both are non-textual rights protected by the due process clause. The main difference is that the right to privacy has not been incorporated, while the right to a speedy and public trial has been incorporated. The right to a speedy and public trial, like the right to a jury trial in suits at common law that involve more than $20, involves substantive legal protections, while the right to privacy involves a proce