1 . Profit maximization and loss minimization Lagatt Green is a monopoly beer producer and distributor operating in the hypothetical economy of Lightington. Assume that Lagatt Green is not able price discriminate, and so it sells its beer to all customers at the same price per bottle. The following graph gives the marginal cost (MC), marginal revenue (MR), average total cost (ATC), and demand (D) curves that Lagatt Green faces for beer in Lightington. Place the black point (plus symbol) on the graph to indicate the profit-maximizing price and quantity for Lagatt Green. If Lagatt Green is making a profit, use the green rectangle (triangle symbols) to shade in the area representing its profit. On the other hand, if Lagatt Green is suffering a loss, use the purple rectangle (diamond symbols) to shade in the area representing its loss.

4.00 3.50 Monopoly Outcome 3.00 ATC 2.50 Profit PRICE (Dollars per bottle) 2.00 Loss 1.50 MC 1.00 0.50 D MR 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 QUANTITY (Thousands of bottles of beer)Suppose Lagatt Green charges $2.75 per bottle. Your study partner Taio says that because Lagatt Green is a monopoly with market power, it should charge the higher price of $3.00 per bottle in order to increase its profit. Complete the following table to determine whether Taio is correct. Price Quantity Demanded Total Revenue Total Cost Profit ( Dollars per bottle) (Cans) (Dollars) (Dollars) (Dollars) 2.75 3.00 Given the earlier information, Taio correct in his assertion that Lagatt Green should charge $3.00 per bottle. Suppose that a technological innovation decreases Lagatt Green's costs so that it now faces the marginal cost (MC) and average total cost (ATC) given on the following graph. Specifically, the technological innovation causes a decrease in average fixed costs, thereby lowering the ATC curve and moving the MC curve.table to determine whether T Quantity Demanded T (Cans) 750 nation, Ta 1,000 correc 1,250 ogical in decreases La Specific 1,500 technologicalle Total Cost (Dollars) 1,000.00 ion th 3,500.00 een sh 3,750.00 costs ow face sasne 5,000.00 JBAB U!750 Ta 1,000 decre 1,250 cific echno 1,5001,000.00 th een should 3,500.00 its w faces the 3,750.00 es in average 5,000.00 the profit-maximizing priGiven the earlier information, Taio correct in his assertion that Lagatt Green should charge $3.00 per bottle. Suppose that a technological innovation decreases Lagatt Green's costs so that it now faces the marginal cost (MC) and average total cost (ATC) given on the following graph. Specifically, the technological innovation causes a decrease in average fixed costs, thereby lowering the ATC curve and moving the MC curve. Place the black point (plus symbol) on the following graph to indicate the profit-maximizing price and quantity for Lagatt Green. If Lagatt Green is making a profit, use the green rectangle (triangle symbols) to shade in the area representing its profit. On the other hand, if Lagatt Green is suffering a loss, use the purple rectangle (diamond symbols) to shade in the area representing the loss.ion, Taio correct in his is not ical innov creases Lagatt G pecifically is hnological innov 6 symbol) on the following graph t4.00 3.50 Monopoly Outcome 3.00 2.50 Profit PRICE (Dollars per unit) 2.00 ATC 1.50 Loss 1.00 0.50 MC D MR 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 QUANTITY (Thousands of bottles of beer)