Question
1. Proof of pure conscious parallelism (parallel business behavior by competitors), standing alone, is enough to establish a violation under Section 1 of the Sherman
1. Proof of pure conscious parallelism (parallel business behavior by competitors), standing alone, is enough to establish a violation under Section 1 of the Sherman Act.
A. True
B. False
2. Mathew Shaw and his friends are associates in the business of garment manufacturing. Their garment association agreed not to sell to retailers who sold clothing with designs pirated from original manufacturers. Typically, the courts will apply the _______
Multiple Choice
A. per se rule to this case of vertical boycott.
B. rule of reason to this case of horizontal boycott.
C. rule of reason to this case of vertical boycott.
D. per se rule to this case of horizontal boycott.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started