1. Read Lucy v. Zehmer and Luebbert v. Simmons (https://law.justia.com/cases/virginia/supreme-court/1954/4272-1.html)

(a) Did the court in Lucy apply an "objective" or "subjective" theory of contracts? Why?

(b)Was the reasoning in Lucy followed by the Missouri court in Luebbert and what were the important facts relied upon in making its decision in Luebbert?

2. Read Lefkowitz v. Great Minneapolis Surplus Store, Inc.(https://www.quimbee.com/cases/lefkowitz-v-great-minneapolis-surplus-store)

(a) Would the results have changed had the fur company stated in its advertisement that the offer is limited to women only? Why or why not?

(b)Since Lefkowitz knew the "house rule," was the court correct in finding a valid offer had been made?