1. Reading The answers are based on Huberman and Regev, 2001, "Contagious speculation and a cure for cancer: A nonevent that made stock prices soar. Please read the whole paper. It is only 10 pages. I. Does this paper present empirical evidence consistent with or contradictory to efficient market hypothesis? II. The paper examines the stock return behavior of the implicated stock (Entremed) and the stock returns of the company's partners and Nasdaq Combined Biotechnology Index. Which part of the analyses provides evaluation of efficient market hypothesis? The answers are based on Maloney and Mulherin, 2003, "The complexity of price discov- ery in an efficient market: the stock market reaction to the Challenger crash. Please read ONLY part 1 and part 2 (the first 8 pages) of the paper. III. Does this paper provide an evaluation of efficient market hypothesis? why or why not? 1. Reading The answers are based on Huberman and Regev, 2001, "Contagious speculation and a cure for cancer: A nonevent that made stock prices soar. Please read the whole paper. It is only 10 pages. I. Does this paper present empirical evidence consistent with or contradictory to efficient market hypothesis? II. The paper examines the stock return behavior of the implicated stock (Entremed) and the stock returns of the company's partners and Nasdaq Combined Biotechnology Index. Which part of the analyses provides evaluation of efficient market hypothesis? The answers are based on Maloney and Mulherin, 2003, "The complexity of price discov- ery in an efficient market: the stock market reaction to the Challenger crash. Please read ONLY part 1 and part 2 (the first 8 pages) of the paper. III. Does this paper provide an evaluation of efficient market hypothesis? why or why not