1- Review Julie Hilden's arguments for why some "expectations" should be made in cases of prosecuting sexting crimes under current child pornography laws. What does she mean by the "Romeo and Juliet" exception and by the "age-specific" exception? Are these exceptions plausile in the kinds of sexting cases that we examined? Describe some of the challenges posed by the age-specific exception. For example, what would happen if a middle-aged man received an unsolicited nude photo from a teenage girl on his cell phone? Should he be prosecuted for possessing a pornographic imagte of a minor? Should the teenage girl who sent this photo to him be prosecuted for transmitting the image? Defend your answer. 2- We briefly noted that some controversies associated with workplace monitoring now have global and international implications. For example, Stephen Coleman points out that in the global workforce, an employee's privacy could be violated by software monitoring programs that reside on a computer located in a country different from where that employee works. Do we need new kinds of international agreements and policies for employee monitoring, as Coleman suggests? And do we need to adopt an "International Bill of Human Rights," as Coleman also suggests, in response to global challenges posed by workplace monitoring? If not, what kinds of alternative proposals might be suitable? Please cite this paper in APA Format: (Author name, Year, Title and Publication) Please do not Plagiarise, This paper will be submitted to plagiarsim check and I will get in trouble if you do. Thanks