1. Rosie Company is accused of making illegal tying agreements when selling its products. Which of the following is a required element of a claim that Rosie Company's tying arrangement violated the Clayton Act?

Proof that the tying product was available for purchase without the agreement.

Proof that the Rosie Company has substantial power in the market for the tying product.

Proof that the Rosie Company's tying arrangements restrained a "not insubstantial" volume of commerce in the tying product.

Proof that the challenged agreement involved two integrated components of a larger product.

2. Relevant Corporation and Outdated, Incorporated are both manufacturers of high fructose corn syrup. Relevant supplies corn syrup to retailers in Utah, Montana, Nebraska, and Minnesota. Outdated supplies corn syrup to retailers in Minnesota, New Mexico, Nebraska, and Montana. In Utah and Nebraska, Relevant faces stiff competition from other syrup suppliers. Outdated is the sole competitor of Relevant in Montana. Relevant faces competition in Minnesota from Outdated and Minnsweet Corporation., a local player who supplies syrup only to retailers in Minnesota. Relevant is planning to acquire Outdated. What is the relevant geographic market for determining the anticompetitive effect of this acquisition?

Nebraska and Minnesota

Utah and New Mexico

Minnesota and Montana

New Mexico and Nebraska