1. (See picture) So you have to think of it more in conceptual terms rather than how the rays of light actually are, bc the light is just reflected- not actually there?????2. So do the rays that are thought to be reflected or refracted basically what us as humans recognize and not the other rays? Because it also mentioned that the contact lenses had a different effect, does the same effect of the "thought to be rays" also occur the same or differently?Please answer these questions very briefly but I'm a detailed manner. Thank you! :)

LLAMbLLLhuwI-'IUO We can repeat the construction of Fig ure 24. 3 [E] for each ray diverging from P. The directions of all the outgoing rays are the same as though they had originated at point PI, conrming that PI is the image of P. The rays do not aco tually pass through point PI. In fact, for an ordinary mirror, there is no light at all on the back side. In cases like this, and like that of Figure 24.2 D, the outgoing rays don't actually come from PI, and we call the image a virtual im' age 6). Later we will see cases in which the outgoing rays really do pass through an image point, and we will call the re sulting image a real image 6). The im ages formed on a projection screen or the photographic lm (or digital sensor array) in a camera are real images. To an observer, virtual images look just as \"real\" as real images