1. Summary of article

2. Discuss the legal issues from a management point of view in depth with hotel examples

Body Wednesday, November 6, 2019 Justice Department Settles with Public Accommodations to Protect the Rights of Veterans who Use Service Dogs As we mark Veterans Day 2019, the Justice Department announced two settlement agreements under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) to protect and advance equal access for veterans with disabilities who use service clogs. One agreement is with Deereld Inn and Suites. in Gadsden. Alabama. The second agreement is with the Landmark Hotel Group in Virginia Beach, Virginia, which manages the Holiday Inn Express in Hampton, Virginia. These matters were investigated and resolved in furtherance of the Department's commitment to ensuring that our veterans enjoy equal access to public accommodations, such as restaurants, hotels, and shops. The ADA generally requires public accommodations to provide access to individuals with disabilities who use service animals, including those who use service dogs for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or anxiety. Yet. in public accommodations across the country, individuals with disabilities are freouentiy barred from entering with a service animal. "individuals with disabilities, including veterans who have sacriced for our country, have a right under federal law to the equal enjoyment of the services that a public accommodation provides to the public." said Assistant Attorney General Eric Dreiband v of the Civil Rights Division. ~The Civil Rights Division is committed to ensuring equal access for our veterans, and we commend these businesses the Deereld Inn and Suites and the Landmark Hotel Group -- for acknowledging their obligations under the Americans with Disabilities Act, and agreeing to implement policies and practices to ensure equal access for individuals who use service dogs." The Deerfield Inn and Suites agreement resolves allegations that, after driving many hours, a veteran arrived at the Deerfield Inn and Suites at 4:00 in the morning. when the desk clerk learned that the veteran was accompanied by her service dog, the desk clerk refused to honor the reservation, insisting that no dogs were permitted in the hotei. Despite numerous attempts by the veteran to explain that the dog was not a pet, but a highiy trained animal required for disabilities she acquired in the service of our country, the clerk would not allow the veteran to stay at the hotel. As a result. and given the late hour, the veteran ended up sleeping in her car in the parking lot of a church. Similarly. the complaint underlying the Landmark Hotel agreement alleged that, at the Holiday Inn Express managed by the Landmark Hotel Group, the desk clerk refused to honor a reservation by a veteran because he would not provide documentation that the dog with him was a service dog. The veteran informed the clerk that it was unlawful to ask for documents to establish that a dog is a service animal, but the desk clerk informed him that such documentation was corporate policy. The veteran then requested to speak to the hotel manager. who conrmed that it was the hotel's policy to require such documentary proof. The veteran was forced to nd another hotel. Under the ADA, public accommodations generally must make modications to their policiesr practices or procedures -- such as a no-pet policy -- to permit the use of a service animal by a person with a disability. A service dog generally may go wherever the public is allowed to gor and a public accommodation may not require documentation about the service dog. Under these agreements. both entities will adopt and implement a service dog policy: provide training on the service dog policy to employees and managers; post the service dog policy at their facilities and in their advertising; and pay money damages to the two veterans. All entities cooperated with the Department throughout the investigations