1. The agreement between Cagle and Schmieding left open the price, quantity, and time for delivery. Since this is a sales of goods contract, the UCC governs it, and the UCC is tolerant of some open terms to an extent. According to the textbook's section on open terms, when would a contract not fail for indefiniteness under the UCC? 2. Given your answer to #1, do you think the court should enforce this as a valid sales contract even though the price, time, and quantity weren't definitely expressed in the oral contract? Explain your reasoning