Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

1. The defence of provocation, even if successfully established through evidence, does not defeat the plaintiff's tort claim in battery, but rather acts as a

1. The defence of provocation, even if successfully established through evidence, does

not defeat the plaintiff's tort claim in battery, but rather acts as a

with respect to damages.

2. Being grabbed by someone on the subway who has lost his balance is an example of

contact and does not constitute .

Short Answer

1. Why is litigation involving the interpretation of waivers not very common in the

context of intentional torts?

2. What is the formula for the defense of necessity, and why is it a rarely used defense

in tort?

3. Under what conditions does the law permit a person to use force in removing a

trespasser from his or her real property, and what is an example of a situation where

"defense of property" might be used as a defense?

4. What must a defendant prove to establish provocation, and what aspect of

provocation can be contentious attrial?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Constitutional Law Cases Materials And Problems

Authors: Russell L. Weaver, Steven I. Friedland, Richard D. Rosen

5th Edition

1543830447, 978-1543830446

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

2. I try to be as logical as possible

Answered: 1 week ago