Question
1. The defence of provocation, even if successfully established through evidence, does not defeat the plaintiff's tort claim in battery, but rather acts as a
1. The defence of provocation, even if successfully established through evidence, does
not defeat the plaintiff's tort claim in battery, but rather acts as a
with respect to damages.
2. Being grabbed by someone on the subway who has lost his balance is an example of
contact and does not constitute .
Short Answer
1. Why is litigation involving the interpretation of waivers not very common in the
context of intentional torts?
2. What is the formula for the defense of necessity, and why is it a rarely used defense
in tort?
3. Under what conditions does the law permit a person to use force in removing a
trespasser from his or her real property, and what is an example of a situation where
"defense of property" might be used as a defense?
4. What must a defendant prove to establish provocation, and what aspect of
provocation can be contentious attrial?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
![blur-text-image](https://dsd5zvtm8ll6.cloudfront.net/includes/images/document_product_info/blur-text-image.webp)
Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
![blur-text-image](https://dsd5zvtm8ll6.cloudfront.net/includes/images/document_product_info/blur-subtext-image.webp)
Step: 3
![blur-text-image](https://dsd5zvtm8ll6.cloudfront.net/includes/images/document_product_info/blur-subtext-image.webp)
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started