1) The first section should answer three questions:

What did the study aim to find?

What was the methodology (Quantitative? Qualitative? Both?)?

What were the conclusions or findings?

2) The second section focuses on your critique of the article.

What are the limitations of the study? Is the study size large enough to provide statistical significance/validity? Was there any bias evident?

What is missing from the study?

What could the study have done differently?

What conclusions can be drawn from the information the study provides?

What directions for future research on the same topic are suggested by the article?

Article: Lger-Goodes, T., Malboeuf-Hurtubise, C., Hurtubise, K., Simons, K., Boucher, A., Paradis, P.-O., Herba, C. M., Camden, C., & Gnreux, M. (2023). How children make sense of climate change: A descriptive qualitative study of eco-anxiety in parent-child dyads. PLoS ONE, 17(4), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284774

Link: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284774