1. The plaintiff agreed to install central heating, costing 5 60. Performance partially defective. The householder discovered the defect, and the plaintiff (plumber) refused to x it. The repair was valued at 174. So, the defendant refused to pay any of the 560 of the contract. Householder - defective central heating worth 560 - 174 = 3 86. 1. Was the contract breached? Explain? 2. Was the plumber entitled to payment? Or is the householder able to get away without paying? 2. The plaintiff was to write a book on 'Costume and Ancient Armour' for a series, and was to receive 100 on completion of the book. After he had done the necessary research but before the book had been written, the publishers abandoned the series. The Plaintiff claimed alternatively on the original contract and on a quantum meruit. Is it right? Diseuss ? 3. Ahmed signs a contract to buy a motorcycle from Harly Davidson. But Ahmed was not feeling well at that time and he was under the inuence of drugs. Now, he feels that some of the terms and conditions of the contract are not in his favour. In your opinion, is this contact void, valid or voidable. Explain