$1.$ There are two different perspectives that you could use to analyze the breach at Target. They were either vulnerable due to organizational inaction or simply unlucky. Take a position on which they were in the first sentence of your answer. Then, devote three paragraphs to include arguments and evidence in support of your answer$\mathrm{.}2.$ What should Target have done better to avoid being breached? In this answer, address this from a technical perspective $($without overlapping any evidence or arguments from Question #$1)\mathrm{.}3.$ What should Target have done better to avoid being breached from an organizational perspective $($without overlapping any evidence or arguments from Question #$1)\mathrm{.}4.$ Provide an overall assessment of Target's post$-$breach response. In your first paragraph, provide an overall assessment $($be specific$).$ Then, in your second paragraph argue for what Target did well $($post breach$)?$ In your third paragraph, argue for what Target did poorly $($post breach?$5.$ What did you learn about how Target handled the breach to apply to your own organization? This must specifically be derived from this case and $\text{'}$ a general statement. You can either focus upor t pre or post breach in your answer.