1. Under the facts of the immediately preceding question (No. 2), Boki may ask for a judicial dissolution of the partnership on the ground that the other partners acted in a manner that is prejudicial to the partnership.

a. true

b. false

2. Still under the facts in No.1, the proportionate share of Boki in the profits obtainable from the apartment building may not be subject for legal support against him.

a. true

b. false

3. Which of the following may not enter into a universal partnership with each other?

a. Persons who are guilty of adultery or concubinage

b. Person who are relatives within the fifth degree of consanguinity

c. Both of the above.

4. Robert heard that Antonio was selling a lot suitable for the purposes of the partnership but which was however under litigation between Antonio and his brother. Robert, without informing his partners of the case, bought the same for the partnership on the promise by Antonio that he will give him 10% of the sale price. Antonio's brother won the case and the partnership was evicted. The knowledge of Robert of the litigation is considered knowledge by the partnership which cannot therefore hold Antonio liable.

a. true

b. false